Table of Contents
I would certainly add Toyota 2/3TC motor is somewhere in the top 3 yet with those domestics you absolutely have my leading 4 of all time for dependability. Brian created: I miss my 4.9 vehicle. Never ever had an engine problem. Corrosion is a various tale. When the exhaust rusted off behind the cat it just seemed like a diesel.
I ask yourself just how hard a swap it would certainly be to get it into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ... has a difficult time obtaining out of it's very own means ... the 300i6 would do whatever I need this vehicle to do patgizz wrote: 3 things in the automobile world refuse to damage.
those need to be held as the benchmark to which whatever else is measured. Practically everything else pales in contrast. And the Toyota 2f/3f (based upon the chevy stovebolt 6 obviously) Wow, because of the outpour of praise, it looked great so I got it, here's the advertisement lmk what you individuals assume Oops, really did not indicate to be puzzling, it slid my mind that the "5.0" was technically a 4.9 l.
Order of biz though, I'm fairly big, and the guiding wheel to seat is rather narrow ... male that wheel cover was not ribbed for my pleasure:-LRB- The only problem I've ever before seen with trucks like that, are busted shifters. Ford made them a little also difficult and they would certainly snap right at the floorboard.
Maintain in mind the gas mileage won't be the best in the globe, however it will certainly damn sure run for life. Never had an engine concern.
When the exhaust rusted off behind the feline it simply seemed like a diesel. In 4x4 it returned 15 blended, 20 highway with the OD5. I question how hard a swap it would be to obtain it into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ... has a tough time leaving it's own method ... The engine bay had not been designed for anything longer than a Mod electric motor. One CAN eliminate an engine from a '97 design F-150 from the top, however it draws. Mod motors need ahead out sideways and you need to pull the damper and water pump off of a 4.2. The core support does not unbolt like in F250s and later on F150s.
WonkoTheSane composed: spitfirebill wrote: In reply to HappyAndy: Thanks Captain Obvious What did he say to require this? I'm really curious. I didn't see anything in his reply that would certainly need this response. "They are usually trustworthy as gravity as long as they aren't sludged up" What engine loves sludge? Knurled created: wbjones wrote: Brian wrote: I miss my 4.9 vehicle.
Rust is a different tale. When the exhaust rusted off behind the pet cat it simply sounded like a diesel. In 4x4 it returned 15 blended, 20 highway with the OD5. I wonder exactly how hard a swap it would certainly be to get it right into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ...
Very extremely confined engine bay lengthwise. yeah, had actually currently figured that out ... it was a tongue in cheek message, that I didn't explain ... my bad In respond to spitfirebill: I added that point because when I needed to locate a substitute 4.9 for my F150, I had to go via each in every junkyard in South Jersey to locate one that had not been sludged up actually terribly.
Bernie: Which is a much better van, while we're going to chat about a couple of issues of these vans, yet I I'm clearly not going to come out and state one is better than the various other. Bernie: Well, they're essentially the same automobile.
Mark: So, well, let's start with engines after that. Allow's speak regarding engine and really simply to specify that the model years, we're going to start from 2000 and up, you recognize, I mean, these vans have actually been around for a long time.
And, you know, for a variation of a Chevy van has been around since, you recognize, around that time as well. Since 2000, I imply, Ford's, you can obtain these with V6 engines or V8s.
There's a lot of issues with these engines. In the earlier 2000 stimulate plugs with impact to these engines, since they really did not have adequate threading in the spark plug, which created troubles.
Very really cramped engine bay lengthwise. yeah, had already figured that out ... it was a tongue in cheek post, that I really did not make clear ... my negative In reply to spitfirebill: I added that point since when I needed to discover a substitute 4.9 for my F150, I had to go through each in every junkyard in South Jacket to find one that wasn't sludged up really badly.
Bernie: Which is a much better van, while we're going to speak about a couple of problems of these vans, but I I'm plainly not mosting likely to appear and claim one is better than the other. So if that's what you're looking for, you'll need to wait. Mark: So what are several of the distinctions in between these 2 brand names? Bernie: Well, they're basically the very same vehicle.
They appear to be a bit much more utilized in that area, but, you recognize, those are some of the uses, but they're basically the same classification of car. Mark: So, well, allow's begin with engines then. What issues do you see in between these two vehicles? Bernie: Yeah. Allow's speak concerning engine and in fact simply to define that the version years, we're going to begin from 2000 and up, you understand, I suggest, these vans have been around for a long time.
And, you know, for a version of a Chevy van has actually been around given that, you know, around that time also. Considering that 2000, I indicate, Ford's, you can get these with V6 engines or V8s.
There's a great deal of issues with these engines. In the earlier 2000 spark plugs with strike to these engines, due to the fact that they really did not have sufficient threading in the stimulate plug, which created troubles.
Navigation
Latest Posts
Ford F150 dealership
Ford F150 dealer
Ford F150 dealership